Lectura digital en estudiantes universitarios: contribuciones del funcionamiento ejecutivo y hábitos lectores

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Ángel-Javier Tabullo
Enrique-Salvador Pulifiato-Hamann

Resumen

El presente estudio examinó la comprensión de textos expositivos y narrativos en pantalla y su relación con las funciones ejecutiva, los hábitos lectores y el soporte preferido (papel o pantallas) para lectura de estudio o recreativa, en estudiantes universitarios. Participaron noventa y ocho estudiantes universitarios (76.8% mujeres, edad promedio: M = 20.6, DS = 5.24 años), quienes completaron una tarea de comprensión de un texto expositivo y uno narrativo presentados en pantalla, una evaluación computarizada de las funciones ejecutivas (memoria de trabajo, flexibilidad cognitiva, inhibición), una encuesta de hábitos lectores y un test de reconocimiento de autores. La memoria de trabajo fue un predictor de la comprensión en general, mientras que la flexibilidad se asoció al texto expositivo. La exposición a la ficción contribuyó específicamente al texto narrativo. Los alumnos acostumbrados a estudiar en pantalla tuvieron un mejor desempeño en el texto expositivo que quienes prefieren el papel. La contribución de las funciones ejecutivas a la comprensión en pantallas es similar a la observada en estudios de lectura en papel. El efecto del soporte preferido sugiere que la práctica podría compensar la modalidad de lectura más superficial que se observa típicamente en estudios de lectura en medios digitales.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Cómo citar
Tabullo, Ángel-J., & Pulifiato-Hamann, E.-S. (2024). Lectura digital en estudiantes universitarios: contribuciones del funcionamiento ejecutivo y hábitos lectores. Ocnos, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2024.23.2.424
Sección
Artículos

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abusamra, V., Cartoceti, R., Ferreres, A., De Beni, R., y Cornoldi, C. (2009). La comprensión de textos desde un enfoque multicomponencial. El Test “Leer para comprender”. Ciencias psicológicas. 3 (2): 193-200

Abusamra, V., Difalcis, M., Martínez, G., Low, D., & Formoso, J. (2020). Cognitive Skills Involved in Reading Comprehension of Adolescents with Low Educational Opportunities. Languages, 5(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030034

Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023

Alrizq, M.; Mehmood, S.,Mahoto, N.A., Alqahtani, A.. Hamdi, M., Alghamdi, A., Shaikh, A. Analysis of Skim Reading on Desktopversus Mobile Screen. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7398. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167398

Aprender 2021: Educación Primaria: informe nacional de resultados: análisis sobre los logros de aprendizaje y sus condiciones. - 2a ed - Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación de la Nación, 2022. Recuperado de: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/informe_aprender_2021_1.pdf

Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.902461

Ball, R. & Hourcade, J.P. (2011) Rethinking Reading for Age From Paper and Computers, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27:11, 1066-1082, . https://10.1080/10447318.2011.555319

Barreyro, J.P., Injoque-Ricle, I., Formoso, J., & Burin, D. (2019). Computerized Working Memory Battery (BIMeT-V): Studying the Relation between Working Memory, Verbal Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. Trends in Psychology, 27(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.1-05

Barzillai, M., & Thomson, J. M. (2018). Children learning to read in a digital world. First Monday, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i10.9437

Benedetti, P., Cotton, A., Ballarini, F., Abusamra, V., & Ramírez Butavand, V. (2020, Octubre 7-9). Electronic reading: Impact of different digital devices on reading comprehension [Presentación en e-poster]. XXXV Annual Meeting of the Argentinian Society for Neuroscience Research, Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://san2020.saneurociencias.org.ar/epostersbytopics/

Breadmore, H., Vardy, E., Cunningham, A., Kwok, R., & Carroll, J. (2019). Literacy Development: Evidence Review. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Literacy_Development_Evidence_Review.pdf

Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2018). The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 801–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9422-6

Cartwright, K.B., Lee, S.A., Barber, A.T., DeWyngaert, L.U., Lane, A.B., & Singleton, T. (2020). Contributions of Executive Function and Cognitive Intrinsic Motivation to University Students’ Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55( 0), 345– 369. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.273

Clinton, V. (2019) Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42: 288– 325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269

Clinton-Lisell, V., Taylor, T., Carlson, S. E., Davison, M. L., & Seipel, B. (2022). Performance on Reading Comprehension Assessments and College Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 52(3), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2022.2062626

Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R. & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003

Duke, N.K., & Cartwright, K.B. (2021). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quaterly, 56(S1), S25– S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

Duncan, L. G., McGeown, S. P., Griffiths, Y. M., Stothard, S. E., & Dobai, A. (2016). Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension. British journal of psychology, 107(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12134

Follmer, D. J. (2018). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295

Follmer, D., & Sperling, R. A. (2018). Interactions between reader and text: Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.005

Georgiou, G. K., & Das, J. P. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of executive function on reading comprehension in young adults: Direct and Indirect Effects of Executive Function. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12091

Hahnel, C., Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., & Kröhne, U. (2016). Effects of linear reading, basic computer skills, evaluating online information, and navigation on reading digital text. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part A), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.042

Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2018). The Simple View of Reading: Three Assessments of Its Adequacy. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773154

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163

Introzzi, I. & Canet-Juric, L. (2019). TAC: Tareas de Autorregulación Cognitiva. https://tac.com.ar/evaluacion/

Richard's, M. M., Krzemien, D., Valentina, V., Vernucci, S., Zamora, E. V., Comesaña, A., García Coni, A., & Introzzi, I. (2021). Cognitive flexibility in adulthood and advanced age: Evidence of internal and external validity. Applied neuropsychology. Adult, 28(4), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1652176

Kieffer, M. J., Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Logan, J. K. (2021). Executive functions and English reading comprehension growth in Spanish-English bilingual adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101238

Lauterman, T. & R. Ackerman, 2014. “Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration,” Computers in Human Behavior, volume 35, pp. 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046

Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T. P., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1

Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2014). Word reading skill predicts anticipation of upcoming spoken language input: a study of children developing proficiency in reading. Journal of experimental child psychology, 126, 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.05.004

Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890

Ober, T. M., Brooks, P. J., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2019). Distinguishing Direct and Indirect Effects of Executive Functions on Reading Comprehension in Adolescents. Reading Psychology, 40(6), 551–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1635239

OECD (2019), OECD Skills Strategy 2019: Skills to Shape a Better Future, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264313835-en

OECD (2021), 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730

Potocki, A., Sanchez, M., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive profiles of 8-to 15-year-old children with specific reading comprehension difficulties: the role of executive functions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415613080

Rayner, K. & Reichle, E.D. (2010). Models of the reading process. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 787–799 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.68

Richard's, M. M., Krzemien, D., Valentina, V., Vernucci, S., Zamora, E. V., Comesaña, A., García Coni, A., & Introzzi, I. (2021). Cognitive flexibility in adulthood and advanced age: Evidence of internal and external validity. Applied neuropsychology. Adult, 28(4), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1652176

Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H.I., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M., & Broek, P. (2018b). Comprehension processes in digital reading. En: Barzillai, M.; Thomson, J.; Schroeder, S. & van den Broek, P. (Eds.) Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91-120). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Jonh Benjamins Publishing Co.

Schurer T, Opitz B and Schubert T (2020) Working Memory Capacity but Not Prior Knowledge Impact on Readers’ Attention and Text Comprehension. Frontiers in Education, 5:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00026

Sidi, Y., M. Shpigelman, H. Zalmanov, and R. Ackerman. (2017). “Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing,” Learning and Instruction, volume 51, pp. 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.002

Singer, L. & Alexander, P. (2017a). “Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal,” Review of Educational Research, 87, 6, 1,007–1,041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961

Singer, L. & Alexander, P. (2017b). “Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration,” Journal of Experimental Education, volume 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794

Spencer, M., Richmond, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2020). Considering the Role of Executive Function in Reading Comprehension: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 24(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1643868

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433.

Tabullo, Á.J, Pithod, M., Moreno Bataller, C.B. (2021). Associations between reading comprehension, print exposure, executive functions and academic achievement in Argentinean university students. Revista de Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias, 20 (2); 15-48. Recuperado de: http://revistaneurociencias.com/index.php/RNNN/article/view/117

Tabullo, Ángel J., Wainselboim, A. J. & París , L. A. (2022). La comprensión de textos expositivos y narrativos y su relación con el vocabulario. La eficacia lectora y el control inhibitorio en niños de cuarto grado. Traslaciones. Revista Latinoamericana De Lectura Y Escritura, 9(17), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.5.070

Wylie, J., Thomson, J.M., Leppänen, P., Ackerman, R., Kanniainen, L., & Prieler, T. (2018). Cognitive processes and digital reading. In Barzillai, M.; Thomson, J.; Schroeder, S. & van den Broek, P. (Eds.) Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91-120). . Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Jonh Benjamins Publishing Co.

Wu, Y., Barquero, L. A., Pickren, S. E., Barber, A. T., & Cutting, L. E. (2020). The relationship between cognitive skills and reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 4. Learning and individual differences, 80, 101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101848