Given the relevance of reading, we are presenting a study on reading preferences among students in 6th grade of Primary Education. The objective is to determine the attitudes towards reading and the reading preferences of these students based on two variables: gender and type of school. To this end, a questionnaire was administered to a sample of 416 6th grade students from 9 schools, in which attitudes towards reading, preferences in the choice of literary genres and topics, as well as the use of new media and language of frequent reading were evaluated. The results, analysed using a descriptive non-experimental method, indicate that girls show more favourable attitudes towards recreational reading, with more diverse interests in terms of genre, topics and language. Likewise, public schools show more encouraging results in all the dimensions addressed. This research highlights the need to review existing reading practices and implement new proposals from the paradigm of literary education, which will result in the development of the reading competence and other types of learning.
Article Details
How to Cite
Agrelo-Costas, E., Mociño-González, I., & Míguez-Álvarez, C. . (2023). Reading preferences of Primary Education students according to sex and type of school. Ocnos. Journal of reading research, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2023.22.2.389
Agrelo-Costas, Mociño-González, and Míguez-Álvarez: Reading preferences of Primary Education students according to sex and type of school
Introduction
Reading is of great interest in the school sphere, both because it leads to access
to knowledge and culture, and because of its transformative nature. Becoming a competent
reader involves the control of actions linked to textual comprehension and adaptation
to the proposed reading objectives (). Addressing this task through literary education fosters the development of literary
competence (), which requires the mastery of other sub-competences (textual, genre, metaliterary,
intertextual, encyclopaedic and cultural), to which should be added attitudes towards
learning and the effect of other factors (linguistic, psychological, social, historical,
cultural and literary above all) ().
Reading literacy leads to the enjoyment and voluntary practice of reading, as well
as to making progress in reading literacy and gaining other skills (). This wilfulness - beside school prescription - has an impact on the formation of
the reading habit (), which increases communicative fluency, the improvement of cognitive abilities and
the stimulation of the imagination (). Students who read more also obtain better grades, although they are more critical
of the education system, as they “believe that more time is spent on traditional methodologies
(listening to teachers’ explanations) and less on more participatory proposals that
leave autonomy and initiative to students” ().
The rewarding encounter with reading determines the future attitude towards reading
and learning (; ), so the teacher-mediator should consider the students’ reading preferences and select
literary works capable of seducing them and accompanying them in their education (; ). Moreover, by perceiving that their preferences influence the teacher’s decision,
they will be more motivated to read (; ; ). In fact, these works could be the prelude to others from the academic canon, promote
the reduction of texts notable for their popularity and contribute to the enrichment
of “their initial spontaneous interests, with the aim of overcoming gender stereotypes”
().
On the other hand, teachers should rethink their role as mediators, as their reading
influence on students is limited to 15.38% (). This is because the environment is the real mediator, i.e. the dominant cultural
conception and way of life in a given context, on the basis of which consumerism is
encouraged and cultural homologation is promoted (). This also affects the family, whose share of influence is reduced to 13% (), despite the fact that their involvement improves reading attitudes and skills ().
It is essential to pay attention to these aspects in 6th grade of Primary Education, becoming an adolescent entails a progressive reduction
in reading (, ; ), especially among boys (). They perceive it as an information tool and not so much as a leisure option (), as well as feeling more demotivated because it does not offer them a repertoire
close to their tastes () and because they almost always start from a lower reading competence ().
As schools must listen to their students in order to train competent readers (), generally speaking this paper is aimed at identifying the attitudes towards reading
and the reading preferences of students in 6th year of Primary Education, taking into account two variables: gender and the type
of school. In the first case (boys/girls), to verify whether gender stereotypes emerge
from initial readings (; ) and to contribute to equity in reading; in the second (public/private), because
it is relevant to delve into how diverse ecosystems influence reading ().
This general objective is specified in other more specific ones such as: to determine
the attitude towards reading both as a leisure activity and as a regulated practice;
and to establish reading preferences in relation to literary genres, themes, media
and language, relevant aspects to stimulate the reading habit and personal enjoyment,
which strengthen the relationship between reading competence and performance (; ).
Method
This study falls within quantitative research techniques and employs the descriptive
non-experimental method to delimit a series of conditions that characterise a given
population group ().
Sample
An incidental sample of students from 6th year of Primary Education was selected, with non-probabilistic convenience sampling.
All 25 primary schools in Pontevedra city council were asked to participate: 18 public
and 7 private schools, according to data from the Department of Education of Galicia.
925 students were enrolled in 6th year. The aim was to involve as many students as possible. The final sample consists
of 416 students, 198 boys (47.6%) and 218 girls (52.4%) attending 9 schools (6 public,
326 students, and 3 private, 90 students). The sample for private establishments is
smaller because, of the 5 establishments selected, 2 declined to participate.
Instruments
In order to conduct this research, a questionnaire of our own was designed, following
Artola et al. (, ) and Neira (, ). In the first part, it records identification data (gender, country of birth, educational
establishment and everyday language) and, in the second part, 26 items are included
on the students’ reading preferences, assessed using a Likert-type scale. Participants
selected one option from the 5 possible answers: 1-Not at all, 2-Slightly, 3-Somewhat, 4-Quite a lot and 5-A lot.
Items were divided according to the information they assessed into 5 domains: attitudes
towards reading (1 and 2); preferences in the choice of literary genres (3 to 8);
thematic interests (9 to 23); use of new reading media (24, plus 1 open-ended question);
and frequent reading language (25 and 26).
Procedure
The questionnaire was reviewed and validated by a group of experts made up of university
teachers of language and literature didactics from the Primary Education degree, as
well as practising teachers from 6th year of Primary Education. With the informed consent of the parents and the accompaniment
of the classroom tutor, the questionnaires were distributed to the whole class group.
The Declaration of Helsinki research protocol was followed. After a series of brief
explanations of its purpose and content, their questions were read aloud, with an
emphasis on question 7, to facilitate the identification of the picture book. Students
were given 20 minutes to respond.
Data analysis schedule
The data were computerised and reviewed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25. The reliability
of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and the descriptive data
(mean and standard deviation) were analysed as a whole and in groups: boys and girls,
and public and private schools. The distribution of responses in the latter 2 groups
was compared with the Mann-Whitney U test and the level of significance was calculated
with Fisher’s exact method. On the other hand, the correlation between the dimensions
into which the items are grouped was calculated using Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient.
The level of significance was set at p<.05, a common index for studies in the Humanities
and Social Sciences.
Results
The reliability of the scale was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha as a tool. The
result was α=.824, which is above the minimum required for reliable research (=.70) (). Moreover, this result is very similar to that obtained by , who used a similar questionnaire on a sample of students of 6th year (=.86).
Items assessing attitudes towards reading include a liking for recreational reading
and for reading prescribed in the classroom. As can be seen in table 1, the participants show an acceptable attitude towards this practice, although the
preference for recreational reading is higher than that proposed by the teachers.
We find a significant gender difference favourable to girls in voluntary reading,
but no significant gender dissimilarity in compulsory reading.
Table 1.Attitudes towards reading by gender (Mean and SD)
Item
General
Gender
Boys
Girls
S
In favour of...
Do you like reading...
1. in your spare time?
3.58
(1.14)
3.26
(1.15)
3,88
(1.05)
<.001
Girls
2. the books proposed by your teachers?
3.24
(1.11)
3.13
(1.11)
3.33
(1.11)
.308
The comparison by school (table 2) shows that, although students in public schools like to read more in their free
time, such difference is not significant. However, when it comes to the enjoyment
of the books prescribed by teachers, students in public schools tend to prefer them
to those in private schools, where teachers’ choices seem to be less accepted.
Table 2.Attitudes towards reading by type of school (Mean and SD)
Item
General
Type of school
Public
Private
S
In favour of...
Do you like reading...
1. in your spare time?
3.58
(1.14)
3.64
(1.14)
3.38
(1.13)
0.54
2. the books proposed by your teachers?
3.24
(1.11)
3.37
(1.1)
2.78
(1.03)
<.001
Public school
Items on preferences in the choice of literary genre were elaborated on the basis
of classification by literary genre and subject matter. According to table 3, students prefer to read narrative works, comics and picture books, with theatre,
poetry and the press being the least popular. In terms of gender, girls gave higher
scores to narrative, theatre and press/magazines, while boys gave higher scores to
comics.
Table 3.Preferences in the choice of literary genres by gender (Mean and SD)
Item
General
Gender
Average (SD)
Boys
Girls
S
In favour of...
Do you like reading...
Average (SD)
Average (SD)
3. narrative?
3.6 (1.23)
3.31 (1.30)
3.86 (1.11)
<.001
Girls
4. poetry?
2.62 (1.33)
2.49 (1.30)
2.73 (1.35)
.176
5. theatre?
2.95 (1.39)
2.57 (1.30)
3.29 (1.39)
<.001
Girls
6. comics?
3.52 (1.44)
4.05 (1.16)
3.05 (1.50)
<.001
Boys
7. picture books?
3.11 (1.27)
3.16 (1.21)
3.07 (1.32)
.377
8. press or magazines?
2.71 (1.32)
2.49 (1.30)
2.91 (1.32)
.027
Girls
As for the type of school, table 4 shows that students in public schools have a greater preference for works of poetry
and comics than students in private schools.
Table 4.Preferences in the choice of literary genres by type of school (Mean and SD)
Item
General
Type of school
Public
Private
S
In favour of...
Do you like reading...
3. narrative?
3.6 (1.23)
3.64 (1.21)
3.48 (1.29)
.164
4. poetry?
2.62 (1.33)
2.69 (1.31)
2.37 (1.37)
.049
Public school
5. theatre?
2.95 (1.39)
2.94 (1.40)
2.99 (1.38)
.792
6. comics?
3.52 (1.44)
3.65 (1.39)
3.06 (1.50)
<.001
Public school
7. picture books?
3.11 (1.27)
3.09 (1.26)
3.2 (1.28)
.073
8. press or magazines?
2.71 (1.32)
2.69 (1.31)
2.81 (1.37)
.734
Thematic preferences were also based on classification. Table 5 shows that the preferred themes are: adventure and action, humour, mystery and horror,
and fantasy. By gender, girls give higher ratings to fantasy, love, family, family,
police and detectives, mystery and horror stories. On the other hand, boys give significantly
higher scores to sports.
Table 5.Thematic preferences by gender (Mean and SD)
Item
General
Gender
Boys
Girls
S
In favour of...
Do you like to read books about...
9. adventure and action?
4.31 (.97)
4.3 (.98)
4.32 (.96)
.087
10. mystery and terror?
3.93 (1.29)
3.93 (1.21)
3.93 (1.36)
.044
Girls
11. fantasy?
3.77 (1.24)
3.47 (1.27)
4.04 (1.16)
<.001
Girls
12. sci-fi?
3.26 (1.81)
3.38 (1.37)
3.16 (1.32)
.335
13. cops and detectives?
3.41 (1.30)
3.27 (1.26)
3.55 (1.33)
.017
Girls
14. love?
2.46 (1.4)
1.84 (1.08)
3.02 (1.42)
<.001
Girls
15. humour?
4.26 (1.04)
4.3 (1.03)
4.22 (1.06)
.972
16. family stories?
3.14 (1.20)
2.76 (1.18)
3.49 (1.10)
<.001
Girls
17. everyday problems?
2.67 (1.39)
2.59 (1.36)
2.73 (1.41)
.393
18. historical events?
3.07 (1.29)
3.16 (1.27)
2.99 (1.31)
.610
19. animals or plants?
3.13 (1.25)
3.15 (1.20)
3.11 (1.29)
.518
20. science?
3.28 (1.34)
3.41 (1.28)
3.16 (1.38)
.117
21. sport?
3.09 (1.51)
3.42 (1.50)
2.78 (1.46)
<.001
Boys
22. historical figures?
2.92 (1.27)
2.98 (1.28)
2.87 (1.26)
.833
23. other cultures?
3 (1.26)
2.88 (1.25)
3.12 (1.27)
.419
In terms of differences by type of school, table 6 shows that the distribution is similar, except that students in public schools give
higher scores to humour books and stories about everyday problems, while those in
private schools opt for police and detective stories.
Table 6.Thematic preferences by type of school (Mean and SD)
Item
General
Type of school
Public
Private
S
In favour of...
Do you like to read books about...
9. adventure and action?
4.31 (.97)
4.35 (.93)
4.18 (1.10)
.480
10. mystery and terror?
3.93 (1.29)
3.98 (1.27)
3.77 (1.34)
.486
11. fantasy?
3.77 (1.24)
3.78 (1.27)
3.73 (1.17)
.431
12. sci-fi?
3.26 (1.81)
3.31 (1.33)
3.1 (1.40)
.117
13. cops and detectives?
3.41 (1.30)
3.44 (1.27)
3.3 (1.43)
.009
Private
14. love?
2.46 (1.4)
2.44 (1.39)
2.52 (1.45)
.873
15. humour?
4.26 (1.04)
4.32 (.99)
4.03 (1.19)
.006
Public school
16. family stories?
3.14 (1.20)
3.17 (1.23)
3.03 (1.10)
.102
17. everyday problems?
2.67 (1.39)
2.74 (1.40)
2.38 1.29)
.030
Public school
18. historical events?
3.07 (1.29)
3.1 (1.30)
2.94 (1.26)
.780
19. animals or plants?
3.13 (1.25)
3.17 (1.23)
3 (1.30)
.435
20. science?
3.28 (1.34)
3.3 (1.33)
3.22 (1.36)
.982
21. sport?
3.09 (1.51)
3.07 (1.51)
3.14 (1.53)
.283
22. historical figures
2.92 (1.27)
2.93 (1.27)
2.9 (1.28)
.979
23. other cultures?
3 (1.26)
3.02 (1.27)
3 (1.26)
.947
The dimension of the use of new reading media was assessed through item 24 and an
open-ended question. Figure 1 shows that almost half of the students read on paper (167 responses), followed by
tablet (115 responses), computer (66 responses) and mobile phone (54 responses). By
contrast, e-books are the least used medium, with only 14 responses. Statistical results
show there are no significant differences according to gender (p=.314) or school (p=.293).
Figure 1Reading media (%)
The last dimension refers to the usual language of reading (Galician or Spanish).
The results in tables 7 and 8 show a preference for Spanish. These results are related to the language of use of
the participants: only 9 are Galician-speaking and all belong to public schools.
Table 7.Usual language of reading by gender (Mean and SD)
Item
General
Gender
Boys
Girls
S
In favour of...
Do you usually read books in...
25. Galician?
2.75 (1.24)
2.60 (1.15)
2.89 (1.30)
.037
Girls
26. Spanish?
4.64 (.74)
4.55 (.82)
4.72 (.66)
.050
Girls
Table 8.Usual language of reading by type of school (Mean and SD)
Item
General
Type of school
Public
Private
S
In favour of...
Do you usually read books in...
25. Galician?
2.75 (1.24)
2.93 (1.22)
2.11 (1.08)
<.001
Public school
26. Spanish?
4.64 (.74)
4.63 (.73)
4.68 (0.79)
.070
Finally, the link between the 5 dimensions under study was calculated. The correlation
between these was calculated using Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient. Table 9 shows that these dimensions are significantly correlated with each other, excepting
dimension 4.
20 significant results in the 26 items of the questionnaire shows that there are remarkable
differences between the reading attitudes (prescribed reading/recreational reading)
and the reading preferences (gender, subject matter, medium and language) of students
in 6th year of Primary Education, taking into account the variables of gender (boys/girls)
and the type of school (public/private). These dimensions are significantly related
to each other, with the exception of the reading medium, which shows reading habits
are made up of different elements (reading attitudes, preference for literary genre,
thematic interests and usual language of reading), which are closely linked. Beyond
the particularities detailed below, it can be said that the most favourable results
in terms of recreational reading correspond to girls, whose reading is more diversified
in terms of literary genre, the subject matter of the stories and the language, while
the results of the dimensions addressed for public schools are also more encouraging.
In general terms, it is found that the attitude towards reading of these students
is acceptable, as has shown, and a taste for recreational reading stands out as opposed to that indicated
by the teacher, especially in girls. This is because they tend to have a stronger
reading habit () and a stronger intrinsic motivation for reading practice (), which they enjoy intensely at the beginning of primary school (). As far as reading prescribed by the teacher is concerned, the difference between
girls and boys is not significant, which is different from other studies (; ), in which it was the boys who did not enjoy their proposals.
If we compare public and private schools, this study shows less interest in recreational
and prescribed reading in private schools, results that coincide with , who point out that students in public schools in Cáceres spend more hours reading
than those in state-subsidised education. These results contrast with those obtained
in a previous study in Spain and 22 other countries, in which ) conclude that private schools perform better in reading than public schools. is along the same lines, explaining these results by the greater number of reading
plans and the greater number of people responsible for their implementation in relation
to public schools. González et al. (2016) also attribute higher reading activity averages
to students in private or state-subsidised schools in their contrastive analysis.
However, dismisses significant divergences between public and private schools in his study
in Galicia, which is based on the grades obtained in the subject of Spanish Language
and Literature.
The reasons that explain the results in favour of some establishments or others may
be due to multiple factors, such as the education of the parents, the economic investment
in education of the families, the equipment of the home or the geographic location
of the establishment (). In our case, the better position of public schools can be due to their greater
involvement in actions related to reading, as revealed in the report of the LIA Plan
for School Libraries of the Government of Galicia (https://www.edu.xunta.gal/biblioteca/blog/?q=node/1613), whose commitment is to place the library as a central space for the improvement
of reading, writing and research skills and the use of information. Other causes of
these results can be linked to the existence of a very dynamic environment in terms
of the offers associated with reading and other creative expressions, which have their
maximum exponent in the Children’s and Young Adult Book Fair of Pontevedra, as well
as to population aspects and socio-economic, educational and cultural conditions of
the context analysed, which are largely analogous to those of .
The data collected call for decisions to be taken in all educational establishments
in order to stimulate the attraction for reading. It is essential to introduce dynamics
to stimulate reading assiduity and intrinsic motivation, especially in children, because,
although frequency is essential, a good attitude, the will to read and the ability
to derive pleasure or benefit from reading are more important (). For this reason, methodological procedures and materials must be revised to suit
the psychological characteristics and interests of the target audience, which are
fundamental starting points for successful reading programmes.
As for the preference in the choice of literary genres, the participating students
prefer narrative and comics to poetry and theatre (Neira, , ), although in this study the press and magazines are not prioritised as a whole,
and the album is included because it is explicitly included in the questionnaire.
This may be a result of occasional contact with some of these manifestations or the
greater difficulty they may entail ().
By gender, boys have a greater preference for comics, and girls for fiction, theatre
and newspapers or magazines. This trend is found in other studies (; ), except for the press and magazines, which tend to be among men’s preferences. This
is derived from the relationship girls establish with publications on fashion TV programme
content, pop culture and the idol phenomenon at that age (). Despite not being among their main interests, poetry continues to appeal more to
girls (), which is evidence that gender stereotypes, in this case linked to the sentimental,
emerge in initial reading preferences (). Hence the relevance of incorporating poetry into the classroom, so that its word
feels closer, its aesthetic value is appreciated and a greater predisposition to read
it is developed ().
With regard to the differences between private and public schools, the latter are
significantly more inclined to read poetry, probably because poetry has been addressed
tangentially and limited to formal issues in public schools. In relation to the greater
reference to comics in private schools, this can be understood as a circumstantial
issue, as it provides attractive reading for all ages and is a motivating source from
which to project diverse learning and the reading habit ().
As for thematic preferences, the taste for adventure and action works, humour, mystery
and horror, and fantasy stands out, as corroborated by similar studies (Neira, , ; ). Girls’ greater appreciation of fantasy, family and police stories, and detectives
(; ; ) or their greater predisposition towards romantic texts with positive characters
(; ; ) also stand out. However, the results obtained differ in that they value mystery
and horror stories more highly, which allows us to glimpse a move towards themes linked
to masculinity.
Nevertheless, the data obtained suggest that sports are among the most preferred options
for boys (), due to their interest in subjects outside school and their greater preference for
short, informative texts (;; ). Although the results are not significant, boys also show a greater inclination
for science fiction, historical facts and figures, science or animals (), as opposed to girls’ greater motivation for books from other cultures.
As for the media, reading on paper predominates over other media (), with no significant dissimilarities between the variables of gender and type of
school. Its justification lies in the persistence of teaching-learning processes rooted
in traditional dynamics and resources, which avoid training in new literacies and
digital media. Research on the impact of the medium (physical or digital) on young
people’s reading comprehension indicates more satisfactory results for paper-based
content (; ; ).
This is due to the difficulty of comprehending digital texts of more than 500 words
(), visual fatigue from screen exposure () and weaker local processing of text details (). The meta-analysis by with primary school students also confirms that results are superior on paper when
reading the same text, unless digital books contain tools to make comprehension easier.
Therefore, more attention will be paid to the reading practices of neo-readers, fascinated
by technology, but with limited competences for reading in different media ().
Lastly, the sample of participants’ command of reading in Spanish is justified by
their urban context, in which the use of Galician is a minority and their contact
with Galician tends to be reduced to the subject of Galician Language and Literature
(). This trend is aggravated by the unfavourable bilingual competence of Spanish-speaking
youth in Galician, which is alarming in private schools (). Contributing to this situation is the lower level of competence of teachers in
relation to the languages spoken in a series of autonomous communities in Spain (), to which is added, in the case of Galician, a limited repertoire of training practices
and materials in this language. The balance of reading, both in the two co-official
languages of Galicia and in foreign languages, requires planning based on the conviction
that literary reading plays a major role in educational processes ().
Although there are differences in the reading habits among students in 6th year of Primary Education, it is clear that even non-readers have certain stimuli
and preferences when it comes to reading. Teachers must therefore undertake an initial
prospecting process, basing their selections on providing references appropriate to
their abilities and interests, as these texts will help to establish the reading habit
and maintain the intrinsic value of reading. Experience shows that this empathetic
encounter will be the beginning, from which communicating vessels will open up towards
more heterogeneous and complementary reading selections. However, this will be implemented
by designing programmes aimed at discovering, experiencing and valuing literary reading.
It should not be forgotten either that the involvement of the class group is fundamental,
as peer-to-peer recommendations are effective in reading dynamics ().
Beyond the above, the present study has some limitations because, although research
has been conducted with students in 6th grade of primary school (see Neira, , , among others), more detailed studies on reading preferences determined by gender
and by whether they belong to a public, state-subsidised or private school would be
necessary (). Furthermore, the size of the sample, which depended on the availability of the
participating schools and was only carried out in the area of Pontevedra, does not
allow the results to be extrapolated to all students in 6th year of Primary School in Galicia. It would also be advisable to broaden the field
of study of reading interests according to the medium, language in multilingual contexts
or other aspects associated with the mediation and evaluation of reading actions.
It is therefore necessary to get involved in these tasks, which will have a positive
impact on the academic and social sphere.
Artola, T., Sastre, S., & Barraca, J. (2017). Diferencias de género en actitudes e
intereses lectores: una investigación de alumnos españoles de primaria. Bordón, 69(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2016.37925
3
Artola, T., Sastre, S., Gratacós, G., & Barraca, J. (2013). Differences in Boys and
Girls Attitudes toward Reading: A Comparison between Single sex and Coeducational
Schools. In Single sex education: An option in the forefront of Education (pp. 113-128). EASSE.
4
Asociación Amigos del Libro Infantil y Juvenil (2018).Estudio de hábitos de lectura en bibliotecas públicas. Universidad de Salamanca.
5
Castillo, C., & Santos, I. C. (2022). Hábitos y consumos lectores en lengua materna
y lengua extranjera del futuro profesorado de Educación Primaria de la Universidad
de Málaga. Investigaciones sobre lectura, 17(1), 83-110. https://doi.org/10.24310/isl.vi17.14483
6
Cerrillo, P. (2007). Literatura infantil y juvenil y educación literaria. Octaedro.
Cid, H. (2014). La incidencia del mediador en las preferencias lectoras de los alumnos de Primaria. [Dissertation, Universidad Complutense]. https://hdl.handle.net/11162/122848
9
Clark, C., & Foster, A. (2005). Children’s and Young People’s Reading Habits and Preferences: The Who, What, Why,
Where and When. National Literacy Trust.
10
Clark, C., Woodley, J., & Lewis, F. (2011). The Gift of Reading in 2011. Children and Young People’s access to Books and Attitudes
towards Reading. National Literacy Trust.
11
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and
metaanalysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
12
CONECTA (2013). Hábitos de lectura y compra de libros en España 2012. Federación de Gremios de Editores de España/Ministerio de Cultura.
13
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your
printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension.
Educational Research Review, 25, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
14
Díaz-Plaja, A. (2009). Entre libros: la construcción de un itinerario lector propio
en la adolescencia. In T. Colomer (Coord.), Lecturas adolescentes (pp. 119-150). Graó.
15
Dronkers, J., & Robert, P. (2007). Differences in Scholastic Achievement of Public,
Private Government-Dependent, and Private Independent Schools. Educational Policy, 22(4), 541-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807307065
Ferreiro, S. F. (2017). Análisis comparativo de los centros públicos y privados medido
a través del premio extraordinario de la ESO en Galicia. Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación, 2, 181-199. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3025
18
Fisher, D., Lapp, D., & Wood, K. (2011). Reading for details in online and printed
text: A prerequisite for deep reading. Middle School Journal, 42(3), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461767
Furenes, M. I., Kucirkova, N., & Bus, A. G. (2021). A Comparison of Children’s Reading
on Paper Versus Screen: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 483-517. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998074
21
Gil, J. (2011). Hábitos lectores y competencias básicas en el alumnado de Educación
Secundaria Obligatoria. Educación XXI, 14(1), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.14.1.274
22
González, M. J., Díaz, G. F., Martín, I., Delgado, M., & Trianes, M. V. (2014). Precisión
lectora y nivel lector inicial en niños de Educación Primaria. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD de
Psicología, 3(1), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v3.503
23
Goodwin, A. P., Cho, S.-J., Reynolds, D., Brady, K., & Salas, J. (2020). Digital Versus
Paper Reading Processes and Links to Comprehension for Middle School Students. American Educational Research Journal, 57(4), 1837-1867. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219890300
24
Jaraíz, F. J., Frutos, M., Tena, R., & Soto, J. (2022). El estudio del hábito lector
en centros educativos públicos y concertados. Aproximación estadística en la ciudad
de Cáceres. In R. Tena y J. Soto (Ed.), Estudios sobre los hábitos de lectura (pp. 33-53). Dykinson. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2gz3v7v.5
25
Jarre, K. R. (2008). Don’t Blame the Boys: We’re Giving Them Girly Books. English Journal, 97(3), 15-16.
26
Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books
on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. Electronic Library, 30, 390-408. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211241663
27
Jiménez-Pérez, E., Martínez-León, N., & Cuadros-Muñoz, R. (2020). La influencia materna
en la inteligencia emocional y la competencia lectora de sus hijos. Ocnos, 19(1), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2020.19.1.2187
28
Jover, G. (2008). Se está haciendo cada vez más tarde: por una literatura sin fronteras.
In C. Lomas (Coord.), Textos literarios y contextos escolares: la escuela en la literatura y la literatura
en la escuela (pp. 149-178). Graó.
29
Lomas C., & Mata, J. (2007). La construcción del hábito de leer. Textos. Didáctica de la Lengua y de la Literatura, 44, 9-18.
30
Loredo, X., & Silva, B. (2020). Avaliación da competencia bilingüe nos idiomas galego e castelán do alumnado de 4º
da ESO. Real Academia Galega.
31
Lluch, G. (2010). Cómo seleccionar libros para niños y jóvenes. Ediciones Trea.
32
Lluch, G., & Zayas, F. (2015). Leer en el centro escolar. El plan de lectura. Octaedro.
33
Margallo, A. M., & Mata, J. (2015). La lectura. Práctica social y formación escolar.
Lectura, sociedad y escuela. In J. Mara, P. Núñez y J. Rienda (Coords.), Didáctica de la lengua y la lectura (pp. 179-202). Pirámide.
34
McGeown, S. P. (2015). Sex or gender identity? Understanding children’s reading choices
and motivation. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01546.x
35
McGeown, S., Goodwin, H., Henderson, N., & Wright, P. (2012). Gender differences in
reading motivation: does sex or gender identity provide a better account? Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01481.x
36
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2005). Investigación educativa. Pearson.
37
Melero, Á., Villalón, R., & Izquierdo-Magaldi, B. (2020). Actitudes hacia la lectura,
sentimiento de competencia, implicación familiar y comprensión lectora en segundo
curso de Educación Primaria. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 18(1), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v18i50.2780
38
Merisuo-Storm, T. (2006). Girls and boys like to read and write different texts. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600576039
39
Merisuo-Storm, T., & Soininen, M. (2014). The interdependence between young students
reading attitudes, reading skills, and self-esteem. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(2), 122-130. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n2p122
40
Moreno, V. (2005). Lectores competentes. Revista de Educación, núm. extr., 153-167.
41
Mosquera, E. (2015). A formación do profesorado de lingua galega: perspectivas pedagóxicas
e modelo lingüístico. Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación, vol. extr., 6, https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2015.0.06.98
42
Mosquera, E. (2018). La enseñanza de la gramática en lengua gallega: problemas metodológicos
e implicaciones prácticas. Lenguaje y Textos, 47, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.4995/lyt.2018.7884
43
Muñoz, J. M., & Hernández, A. (2011). Hábitos lectores de los alumnos de la ESO en
la provincia de Salamanca. ¿Son el género y el entorno factores diferenciales? Revista de Educación, 354, 605-628.
44
Neira, M. del R. (2015). La lectura como actividad de ocio en escolares asturianos
de 6º de Primaria. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 27, 131-151. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_DIDA.2015.v27.50869
45
Neira, M. del R. (2016). Preferencias lectoras en 6º de primaria: una investigación
con escolares asturianos. AILIJ, 14, 123-140.
46
Paré, C., & Soto-Pallarés, C. (2017). El fomento de la lectura de cómics en la enseñanza
de las lenguas en Educación Primaria. Ocnos, 16(1), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2017.16.1.130
47
Pérez, R., Gutiérrez, Á., Soto, J., Jaraíz, F. J., & Gutiérrez, J. A. (2018). Géneros
de lectura preferidos por los alumnos extremeños. Datos y análisis. Información, Cultura y Sociedad, 39, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i39.4208
48
Romero, F. (2007). Utopías lectoras y promoción de la lectura en la escuela. Anuario sobre el libro infantil y juvenil, 1, 81-116.
49
Ruiz, E. E., Moreno, J. S., & Rodilla, N. A. (2022). Iniciación a la investigación
en didáctica de las ciencias sociales: el hábito lector en el Campus de Cáceres. In
R. Tena y J. Soto (Eds.), Estudios sobre hábitos de lectura (pp. 67-84). Dykinson. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2gz3v7v.7
50
Scheiber, C., Reynolds, M. R., Hajovsky, D. B., & Kaufman, A. S. (2015). Gender differences
in achievement in a large, nationally representative sample of children and adolescents.
Psychology in the Schools, 52(4), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21827
51
Schwabe, A., Brandl, L., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Stocker, G. (2021). Experiencing literature
on the e-reader: The effects of reading narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12337
52
Schwartz, W. (2002). Helping underachieving boys read well and often. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) Digest.
53
Soto, J., Cordero, M., & Jaraíz, F. J. (2019). Estudio de casos sobre el hábito de
lectura entre los niños de 0 a 12 años en Extremadura. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 31, 147-170. https://doi.org/10.5209/dida.65946
54
Viramontes, E., Amparán, A., & Núñez, L. D. (2019). Comprensión lectora y el rendimiento
académico en Educación Primaria. Investigaciones Sobre Lectura, 12, 65-82. https://doi.org/10.37132/isl.v0i12.264