Digital Reading in University Students: contributions of Executive Functioning and Reading Habits
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examined the comprehension of expository and narrative texts read on screens, and its association with executive functions, reading habits, and reading media of choice (paper or screen) for study or recreational purposes, in university students. Participants were ninety-eight university students (76.8% women, mean age: M = 20.6, DS = 5.24 years), who completed a screen-based expository and narrative text comprehension task, a computerized executive functions assessment (working memory, cognitive flexibility and inhibition), a survey on reading habits and an author recognition test. Working memory was a general predictor of comprehension, while flexibility was specifically linked to expository text comprehension. Fiction exposure specifically contributed to narrative text comprehension. Students who preferred to study on screens showed better performance on expository text comprehension than those who chose to study on paper. The contribution of executive functions to reading comprehension on screens was similar to that observed in paper-reading studies. The effect of study reading media of choice suggests that practice might compensate the more superficial reading mode that is typically observed in digital media reading studies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles published at Ocnos will have a Creative Common Licence Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported
Downloads
References
Abusamra, V., Cartoceti, R., Ferreres, A., De Beni, R., y Cornoldi, C. (2009). La comprensión de textos desde un enfoque multicomponencial. El Test “Leer para comprender”. Ciencias psicológicas. 3 (2): 193-200
Abusamra, V., Difalcis, M., Martínez, G., Low, D., & Formoso, J. (2020). Cognitive Skills Involved in Reading Comprehension of Adolescents with Low Educational Opportunities. Languages, 5(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030034
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
Alrizq, M.; Mehmood, S.,Mahoto, N.A., Alqahtani, A.. Hamdi, M., Alghamdi, A., Shaikh, A. Analysis of Skim Reading on Desktopversus Mobile Screen. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7398. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167398
Aprender 2021: Educación Primaria: informe nacional de resultados: análisis sobre los logros de aprendizaje y sus condiciones. - 2a ed - Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación de la Nación, 2022. Recuperado de: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/informe_aprender_2021_1.pdf
Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.902461
Ball, R. & Hourcade, J.P. (2011) Rethinking Reading for Age From Paper and Computers, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27:11, 1066-1082, . https://10.1080/10447318.2011.555319
Barreyro, J.P., Injoque-Ricle, I., Formoso, J., & Burin, D. (2019). Computerized Working Memory Battery (BIMeT-V): Studying the Relation between Working Memory, Verbal Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. Trends in Psychology, 27(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.1-05
Barzillai, M., & Thomson, J. M. (2018). Children learning to read in a digital world. First Monday, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i10.9437
Benedetti, P., Cotton, A., Ballarini, F., Abusamra, V., & Ramírez Butavand, V. (2020, Octubre 7-9). Electronic reading: Impact of different digital devices on reading comprehension [Presentación en e-poster]. XXXV Annual Meeting of the Argentinian Society for Neuroscience Research, Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://san2020.saneurociencias.org.ar/epostersbytopics/
Breadmore, H., Vardy, E., Cunningham, A., Kwok, R., & Carroll, J. (2019). Literacy Development: Evidence Review. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Literacy_Development_Evidence_Review.pdf
Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2018). The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 801–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9422-6
Cartwright, K.B., Lee, S.A., Barber, A.T., DeWyngaert, L.U., Lane, A.B., & Singleton, T. (2020). Contributions of Executive Function and Cognitive Intrinsic Motivation to University Students’ Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55( 0), 345– 369. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.273
Clinton, V. (2019) Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42: 288– 325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
Clinton-Lisell, V., Taylor, T., Carlson, S. E., Davison, M. L., & Seipel, B. (2022). Performance on Reading Comprehension Assessments and College Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 52(3), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2022.2062626
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R. & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Duke, N.K., & Cartwright, K.B. (2021). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quaterly, 56(S1), S25– S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
Duncan, L. G., McGeown, S. P., Griffiths, Y. M., Stothard, S. E., & Dobai, A. (2016). Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension. British journal of psychology, 107(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12134
Follmer, D. J. (2018). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295
Follmer, D., & Sperling, R. A. (2018). Interactions between reader and text: Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.005
Georgiou, G. K., & Das, J. P. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of executive function on reading comprehension in young adults: Direct and Indirect Effects of Executive Function. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12091
Hahnel, C., Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., & Kröhne, U. (2016). Effects of linear reading, basic computer skills, evaluating online information, and navigation on reading digital text. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part A), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.042
Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2018). The Simple View of Reading: Three Assessments of Its Adequacy. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773154
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
Introzzi, I. & Canet-Juric, L. (2019). TAC: Tareas de Autorregulación Cognitiva. https://tac.com.ar/evaluacion/
Richard's, M. M., Krzemien, D., Valentina, V., Vernucci, S., Zamora, E. V., Comesaña, A., García Coni, A., & Introzzi, I. (2021). Cognitive flexibility in adulthood and advanced age: Evidence of internal and external validity. Applied neuropsychology. Adult, 28(4), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1652176
Kieffer, M. J., Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Logan, J. K. (2021). Executive functions and English reading comprehension growth in Spanish-English bilingual adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101238
Lauterman, T. & R. Ackerman, 2014. “Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration,” Computers in Human Behavior, volume 35, pp. 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046
Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T. P., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2014). Word reading skill predicts anticipation of upcoming spoken language input: a study of children developing proficiency in reading. Journal of experimental child psychology, 126, 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.05.004
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
Ober, T. M., Brooks, P. J., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2019). Distinguishing Direct and Indirect Effects of Executive Functions on Reading Comprehension in Adolescents. Reading Psychology, 40(6), 551–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1635239
OECD (2019), OECD Skills Strategy 2019: Skills to Shape a Better Future, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264313835-en
OECD (2021), 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
Potocki, A., Sanchez, M., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive profiles of 8-to 15-year-old children with specific reading comprehension difficulties: the role of executive functions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415613080
Rayner, K. & Reichle, E.D. (2010). Models of the reading process. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 787–799 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.68
Richard's, M. M., Krzemien, D., Valentina, V., Vernucci, S., Zamora, E. V., Comesaña, A., García Coni, A., & Introzzi, I. (2021). Cognitive flexibility in adulthood and advanced age: Evidence of internal and external validity. Applied neuropsychology. Adult, 28(4), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1652176
Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H.I., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M., & Broek, P. (2018b). Comprehension processes in digital reading. En: Barzillai, M.; Thomson, J.; Schroeder, S. & van den Broek, P. (Eds.) Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91-120). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Jonh Benjamins Publishing Co.
Schurer T, Opitz B and Schubert T (2020) Working Memory Capacity but Not Prior Knowledge Impact on Readers’ Attention and Text Comprehension. Frontiers in Education, 5:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00026
Sidi, Y., M. Shpigelman, H. Zalmanov, and R. Ackerman. (2017). “Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing,” Learning and Instruction, volume 51, pp. 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.002
Singer, L. & Alexander, P. (2017a). “Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal,” Review of Educational Research, 87, 6, 1,007–1,041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961
Singer, L. & Alexander, P. (2017b). “Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration,” Journal of Experimental Education, volume 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
Spencer, M., Richmond, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2020). Considering the Role of Executive Function in Reading Comprehension: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 24(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1643868
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433.
Tabullo, Á.J, Pithod, M., Moreno Bataller, C.B. (2021). Associations between reading comprehension, print exposure, executive functions and academic achievement in Argentinean university students. Revista de Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias, 20 (2); 15-48. Recuperado de: http://revistaneurociencias.com/index.php/RNNN/article/view/117
Tabullo, Ángel J., Wainselboim, A. J. & París , L. A. (2022). La comprensión de textos expositivos y narrativos y su relación con el vocabulario. La eficacia lectora y el control inhibitorio en niños de cuarto grado. Traslaciones. Revista Latinoamericana De Lectura Y Escritura, 9(17), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.5.070
Wylie, J., Thomson, J.M., Leppänen, P., Ackerman, R., Kanniainen, L., & Prieler, T. (2018). Cognitive processes and digital reading. In Barzillai, M.; Thomson, J.; Schroeder, S. & van den Broek, P. (Eds.) Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91-120). . Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Jonh Benjamins Publishing Co.
Wu, Y., Barquero, L. A., Pickren, S. E., Barber, A. T., & Cutting, L. E. (2020). The relationship between cognitive skills and reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 4. Learning and individual differences, 80, 101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101848